|
|
Season 3, Episode 16: "Coming Out" Essay
Bearing Witness
—Jennifer T.
This episode is entirely about witnesses providing testimony. This idea of
testimony operates within the episode's broader look at trials, judgment and
punishment, but it's the testimony aspect where the power struggles play out.
This episode focuses on Nikki's appeal, so it's almost facile to say that trials
and judgment are a theme of the episode. However, the episode juxtaposes the
informal judgments of the inmates with the formal judgments of Nikki's appeal.
The episode opens with Josh standing above Crystal, looking down on her in
judgment. But in this opening, Josh's judgment is followed by Virginia coming
out of her cell, seemingly for the first time since she was locked up after her
"miraculous" recovery. The entire wing jeers at her, enforcing its own form of
judgment. Later in the episode, Crystal, victim of Josh's judgment, gets to
return the favor when Di asks for her for forgiveness and Crystal condemns her
as "evil."
In the face of this type of judgment, standing up as a witness is a very risky
thing to do. Tina remains loyal to Virginia, standing up for her as a witness
against the entire wing. Maxi punishes Tina pretty immediately, beating her up
thoroughly for her betrayal. Sally Ann Howe dropped her rape charges against DS
Gossard because she was threatened with professional retaliation if she
testified about what happened. When she gave in to the intimidation she fared no
better than Tina: she was pushed out of the police force anyway. Virginia
suffers the ultimate punishment for her willingness to testify. When Fenner
discovers her willingness to "drop [him] in it" she winds up
murdered.
Not only do characters risk punishment for testifying, but they also risk
inefficacy, because their testimony is so rarely believed. It's not surprising
that no one believes Tina when she stands up for Virginia. But some people also
seem to not believe Sally Ann Howe about Gossard raping her. The prosecutor at
Nikki's appeal questions the value of Sally Ann Howe's word, implying her word
on its own is worth nothing. Testimony needs to be corroborated with evidence
for it to be believed.
The reason testimony is so rarely trusted is because it's often pervaded by
deliberate lies. Even Helen, a model of honesty, stands strong against Fenner at
the start of the episode, seemingly willing to allow Barbara to lie on her
behalf. She only gives up this idea when she realizes that Nikki's appeal is at
risk.
Virginia treats the bible with the same respect perjurers do:
witness the many scenes of her pretending to pray in thanks for her miraculous
cure. Crystal, the Christian, concocts and stands by the story of her immaculate
conception in order to save Josh's job. Fenner manipulates Karen back onto his
side after Helen's accusations, telling Karen "you can see right through me" and
then sealing the deal with a marriage proposal.
But as this scene between Karen and Fenner demonstrates, it's not just the
outright lies but people's failure to see the truth of what is happening around
them. Karen is unwilling to see things clearly when it comes to Fenner. In fact,
even those who aren't sleeping with Fenner seem unable to see the evidence of
Fenner's many transgressions. In the car on the way to Nikki's appeal, Fenner
pulls Nikki's hand onto his thigh and, when Nikki expresses her anger, Di
reprimands her. Nikki retorts "Oh when will you open your eyes?" All of the
potential witnesses against Fenner have their eyes closed, and can't or won't
see what he's doing.
Despite the potential negative ramifications for being a witness, characters do
it because of the strength and power which can come from testifying. Yvonne
testifies with perhaps the most efficacy in the entire episode when she tells
the entire wing over lunch about Virginia and Fenner's little deal to run
Virginia's brothels. Even though Sylvia silences Yvonne with a threat of that
pesky Rule 47, with this testimony Yvonne manages to back Virginia up against a
wall, furthering her goal of bringing Fenner down. Fenner accomplishes something
similar with Thomas by informing him of Helen's relationship with Nikki. Fenner
is wildly wrong about the details, but Thomas believes him regardless. Nikki
also testifies against Fenner, in the only way she can. Her moment in front of
the television cameras provides her with the opportunity to be a witness, not
about her crime, but about the horrors she's seen in prison. She speaks to the
press, perhaps the only potential jury for the crimes of the prison system, and
bears witness against Fenner, and for Helen.
Unlike Nikki and Yvonne, Helen spends most of the episode avoiding giving
testimony. Like Yvonne, she's eager to testify as much as she can against Jim
Fenner. She takes her last opportunity in Karen's office. As if in a courtroom,
she must provide her testimony in the presence of Fenner, the accused. She
reminds Karen that Jim is a "misogynist bastard" and how hard she's been trying
to get Karen to see it. Later we find out she has prepared a sort of affidavit,
a written testimony of Fenner's attack on her. She can be a witness against
Fenner now that she's got "nothing to lose." But despite having nothing to lose,
she still tries to avoid being a witness against herself. When she tells Thomas
she's quitting, he demands honesty from her about her reasons, and she refuses
to tell him. She's worried about how he'll react, how he will judge her, and she
gets defensively hostile the more he pushes her. She can't tolerate his judgment
for quitting seemingly without a fight, but even more than that she can't
tolerate his judgment for having an affair with Nikki, so she'll settle for
being judged for the former. Even once Thomas knows about her and Nikki, Helen
still avoids telling him any sort of truth. She obfuscates, babbling on about
choices of who she wants to be with, talking about how things get "twisted" in
prison, "it's its own little world."
Thomas can see that Helen is hiding things from herself, and by hiding her
feelings from herself, Helen is trying to avoid being not just the witness, but
also the judge and jury on herself. For three seasons she's been deeply
uncomfortable with her moral weaknesses in relation to Nikki, her flexibility
with her principles. Whether she's ever been comfortable with the idea of being
in a same-sex relationship is almost besides the point, because she was so
uncomfortable not being perfectly upright, not playing by all the rules, that
she (and we) can't possibly judge her comfort with her sexuality. Self-judgment,
in its way, is the most effective silencer, even more than fear of punishment.
In order to be with Nikki, her true love, Helen must overcome this
self-judgment, her unwillingness to testify about her own feelings and actions.
Therefore, testimony drives the action of the final sequence between Helen and
Nikki. When Helen first arrives at the bar, she avoids revealing anything,
following her same pattern of this entire episode. When Nikki asks if she's got
someone waiting for her, Helen's response is silence followed by absence. Trish
serves as the witness for both Helen and Nikki, refusing Nikki's half-hearted
advances by pointing out that Nikki doesn't "make speeches like that for all the
girls." Trish has observed the evidence and doesn't mind voicing it. She goes
even further by insisting to Nikki after Helen leaves the bar that "of course
she's bloody interested." Nikki chases after Helen, and Helen confesses that she
and Thomas split up. In this moment, Nikki tries to protect Helen from the
dangers of testifying, to give Helen an out, to allow Helen to continue her
avoiding silence, saying "I know what you're saying." But Helen is finally ready
to testify about her feelings and desires. She needs to stand up for herself as
her own witness. She presents her evidence in quite a logical manner. "Thomas is
gorgeous" but he doesn't do anything for Helen. She doesn't want him, she
doesn't want a man.
While we like to remember the closing of this episode as the romantic sight of
Helen and Nikki kissing outside the bar, the other moment which concludes the
episode is far more chilling. Fenner stands over Yvonne as Yvonne gets carried
down to solitary. His face and body tower over her, filling the screen. It's an
echo of Josh's view over Crystal in the opening of the episode, and also implies
a very god-like or at least judge-like presence. It's the physical manifestation
of what Fenner pointed out to Yvonne earlier in the episode: "No one is going to
take your accusation seriously. Not now that soppy Stewart is gone." There's a
new judge, and it's going to be far less likely that anyone's testimony is going
to be believed. Helen and Nikki are lucky they got out when they did.
Author's Note: Thank you to all the readers who have made it to the end! The
only thing which has been more fun than writing these essays is the
discussions which led to them in the first place. I don't know what I would
have done without all the other Bad Girls fanatics out there who were
willing to dissect every detail of the show.
This essay arose from an online discussion on the Nikki
and Helen board. Thanks to the following people who participated:
Cassandra, richard, ekny, Mad Maggot, solitasolano, invisicoll, BlueDogBlues,
voila, DarRoberts, badgirlnuts, msalt, microsofty, Buttons, yankeelady,
Lisa289, Route66, Jeanna, Lizi, DontUWish
|